I'm sorry, but the Fourth Amendment does not protect against the intentional destruction of evidence.
He could have refused search without a warrant, intentionally destroying evidence is a different legal matter.
I'm sorry, but the Fourth Amendment does not protect against the intentional destruction of evidence.
He could have refused search without a warrant, intentionally destroying evidence is a different legal matter.
End your worthless life
So if you really want to nab someone but you don't care what the charge is, you can threaten them with a 4th Amendment-violating search, which induces them to destroy evidence. Pretty neat trick. IANAL, but I don't think it's controversial to say that people who treat the Bill of Rights like an obstacle to be hacked around probably shouldn't be in positions of power.
It's his to destroy. Kill yourself you retarded pierce of fascist shit. Die