i understand the intention, and i offered my opinion on what the actual outcome would be.

~every piece of data can be used for fingerprinting. settings and preferences, browser, os, etc. fingerprinting is not its own category of data, it's the correlation of regular data.

the "pressure" ends up being: stop receiving any data at all (which would obviously break ~everything), or put up a warning (leading to fatigue).

consider accessibility settings: absolutely required for some people to browse the internet, but also extremely high-value data for fingerprinting a user.

there is no technical method to know whether a site asking about a visitor's accessibility settings is doing it so that they can properly display content or so that they can fingerprint the visitor. (i.e. there is no "evil bit")