It looks like the screenshot was an actual photo of someone's monitor. I'm left wondering why print screen wasn't utilized. And for some reason it really makes me not want to touch this project.

Looking at the metadata it says it is a Gnome screenshot. What a pointless and incorrect non-sequitor.

  exiftool -a -u -g1 ~/Downloads/screenshot.png

  ---- ExifTool ----
  ExifTool Version Number         : 13.55
  ---- System ----
  File Name                       : screenshot.png
  Directory                       : XXX
  File Size                       : 1260 kB
  File Modification Date/Time     : 2026:08:11 16:24:37-04:00
  File Access Date/Time           : 2026:08:11 16:24:41-04:00
  File Inode Change Date/Time     : 2026:08:11 16:24:41-04:00
  File Permissions                : -rw-r--r--
  ---- File ----
  File Type                       : PNG
  File Type Extension             : png
  MIME Type                       : image/png
  ---- PNG ----
  Image Width                     : 2351
  Image Height                    : 1388
  Bit Depth                       : 8
  Color Type                      : RGB with Alpha
  Compression                     : Deflate/Inflate
  Filter                          : Adaptive
  Interlace                       : Noninterlaced
  Significant Bits                : 8 8 8 8
  Software                        : gnome-screenshot
  Creation Time                   : Mon 10 Aug 2026 10:19:53 PM +03
  ---- Composite ----
  Image Size                      : 2351x1388
  Megapixels                      : 3.3

To be fair, it does really look like a photo of a monitor.

I didn't think that at all. There weren't even any lightning artifacts or glare or anything.

I thought it was a semi-transparent window until I read this. The curvature makes that clear, wow!

There is no curvature in the screenshot, only a semitransparent background

it is a actually a screenshot, that's zorin's window transparency doing that

Look again.