> even though it was a single code change that was syntax only with no change in behavior just to make it compatible with an older version of the language they claimed to support
It seems like a great stretch to call this "slop".
> even though it was a single code change that was syntax only with no change in behavior just to make it compatible with an older version of the language they claimed to support
It seems like a great stretch to call this "slop".
I agree but it’s their project and their rules. To them I’m just another guy tossing slop over the fence they don’t have time to review in the hig stack of all the other slop.