And I have no problem with this. Infact it would be nice to be a point of pride to be there to say how your security is handled.
And I have no problem with this. Infact it would be nice to be a point of pride to be there to say how your security is handled.
I think this is simply a case of Tailwind saying, we've got no idea what these guys (OpenAI) are talking about.
All these incidents are scarce on technical details. Honestly, IMHO, OpenAI and Anthropic are now actively pushing for AI regulation, as a defence mechanism.
These are false flag operations.
Tailwind or Tailscale?
I think the case is Tailscale is saying, "It's technically not our fault, but we still should've stopped it."
> Infact it would be nice to be a point of pride to be there to say how your security is handled.
Yes, a chance for mere mortals to touch the fingertips of god–er, chat. Same thing.