Haven't seen that article before, thanks for the link! Having read it now, yes, it's arguing roughly the same point as I am. I say roughly because e.g.:

> Notice that all these strengths involve transformation, interpretation, or communication—not complex decision-making or maintaining critical application state.

I'd put complex decision making on the side of LLMs, in the sense of judgement. LLMs have the capability to emulate it. Not saying they're good at it, but they have the capability - regular software doesn't. But if there are complex and/or well-defined rules to follow, then you definitely want to "get the hell out of LLM".