Could these complex/hard to read Fable outputs be sign of some kind of industrial level of intelligence, which us humans may have a hard to comprehend, while it may be also hard for machine to use simpler texts to properly outline all nuances and complexities of concepts it output?
Could these complex/hard to read Fable outputs be sign of some kind of industrial level of intelligence, which us humans may have a hard to comprehend, while it may be also hard for machine to use simpler texts to properly outline all nuances and complexities of concepts it output?
I've increasingly felt like Fable and I speak different dialects of English...
Fable subagents communicate very effectively with one another, so this would be a reasonable take imo
Agreed. I’ve interestingly found 5.6 sol to produce much better writing, and it can generally cut to the point much more effectively.
Opus 4.6 remains unbeatable in my book. Fun to talk to. Fable felt very human. But not as fun.