I'm not at all disagreeing with you about calling these models "open source". They mostly aren't and we should stop conflating the two things.
I'm not at all disagreeing with you about calling these models "open source". They mostly aren't and we should stop conflating the two things.
I think using the term "open" at all in relation to these models is a misnomer. Much in the same way we've spent a lot of time and effort distinguishing "open source" from "source available"
Perhaps instead of "Open weight model" it should be "Weights available model"