I had a tool description earlier but 'sh' as tool name seems to be sufficient, the agent behaviour was the same.
There might be performance gains if a description is added though, or worth trying different ways of telling the agent about what is available in the environment.
That said, the newer models are fairly good at driving a harness to explore the environment.
Great question!
I had a tool description earlier but 'sh' as tool name seems to be sufficient, the agent behaviour was the same.
There might be performance gains if a description is added though, or worth trying different ways of telling the agent about what is available in the environment.
That said, the newer models are fairly good at driving a harness to explore the environment.