This is a really cool idea, and very appealing. Also very nice that it looks usable with just an SSH client. It would be useful if it was explained what the companion client is for?
Another small personal gripe: I think you should either remove the 1 line copy/paste sh install on the homepage, or add a link to a git repo on the homepage. I know it's possible to view the sh by visiting it, but a raw text file doesn't give any info about contributors or development process. Current form of no git repo and copy/paste bash pipe on homepage feels like a dark pattern.
Not to mention that a webserver can be configured to show one sh file when a regular browser visits and another when curl etc. gets it. Show one thing, install another.
So download it with curl and read it first before executing it from your local disk.
read it ? we dont do what kind of stuff here, i got my army of reader agents.
Except you can't really be sure, still: http://web.archive.org/web/20250622061208/https://www.idontp...
This is helpful to know, but also pretty general security practice. If you are auditing an artifact, only use that audited artifact after, don't assume that a network endpoint can never change what it serves. If you must use a newly downloaded artifact, verify it matches whatever you audited by comparing some sort of hash or derived value.
noted, good feedback :) will change it later, thanks!
You don't have to change it just because one person complained. I personally like the "copy and paste curl command" to install something and I'm sure many others do as well. It's very convenient, and I can inspect the file myself if I'm that paranoid about it.
Sorry, it wasn't meant to come across as a complaint with copy and paste curl command, I agree with you it's convenient and I generally like it.
However, the sort of tools that generally provide it also generally have a GitHub link nearby to encourage reading/writing the source. That too is convenient and I generally like it. Seemed like a fair suggestion.