I believe Anthropic shouldn't go bankrupt. I don't think the violated should be filthy rich either.
The richer publishers are still fighting. The ones taking the settlement may not have strong enough grounds and are happy with what they got.
It should be a speed bump. Just enough that it discourages blatantly breaking the law, and doesn't make it a strong incentive for others to resort to piracy as well.
If copyright law didn't exist, writers would still write but everyone would just take the books. A company like Amazon which doesn't give a damn about ethics would pirate all the books; the slap is painful enough to keep them straight.
If it were too tight, we'd have regulatory arbitrage; AI companies would set up in Japan, Singapore, India, China, and so on where they would get just a slap on the wrist.
Or if international laws were stricter, people would be pirating data on Elon Island or SpaceXAI Station. Forbidding something that valuable would be like Prohibition, lucrative for the criminals.
It's not really fair to anyone, and yet that doesn't mean it shouldn't exist.
Yes, what would you like to happen?
I believe Anthropic shouldn't go bankrupt. I don't think the violated should be filthy rich either.
The richer publishers are still fighting. The ones taking the settlement may not have strong enough grounds and are happy with what they got.
It should be a speed bump. Just enough that it discourages blatantly breaking the law, and doesn't make it a strong incentive for others to resort to piracy as well.
If copyright law didn't exist, writers would still write but everyone would just take the books. A company like Amazon which doesn't give a damn about ethics would pirate all the books; the slap is painful enough to keep them straight.
If it were too tight, we'd have regulatory arbitrage; AI companies would set up in Japan, Singapore, India, China, and so on where they would get just a slap on the wrist.
Or if international laws were stricter, people would be pirating data on Elon Island or SpaceXAI Station. Forbidding something that valuable would be like Prohibition, lucrative for the criminals.
It's not really fair to anyone, and yet that doesn't mean it shouldn't exist.