I wonder if the judge would be in favor of companies proactively going into people's houses at random to check on their belongings, if they don't have inappropriate photos somewhere, or whatever.
It's harder to do, but conceptually the same. So sad it's not being done. Very disturbing.
They could do it when people are not at home. There'd no problem, nobody would even notice.
Kind of a bad analogy (not service related, no associated liability).
A better one: what about rental property, like a business? Can the landlord randomly check for criminal behavior?
> Can the landlord randomly check for criminal behavior?
Absolutely not.
[flagged]
It is drowning in sarcasm, so I would say yes, it is a joke.
The comment above is illustrating why the judge’s decision would be silly in another circumstance. And if it’s silly in that circumstance, it’s silly in the judge’s circumstance as well.
They are being sarcastic.