As an artist (former, really[0]), I can confirm that the medium really, really matters. It can inform the creation, as much as the creator.

There are top-shelf authors that insist on writing everything in cursive, in legal pads (God help the poor schlubs that have to transcribe it, though). They insist that they can’t be creative, otherwise. There are musicians (like Rhiannon Giddens), that always perform barefoot.

Most of the Great Masters could work in many mediums, and they chose specific media, to do specific works, because they knew that the medium would “push back,” and inform the work.

Michelangelo was quoted as saying something like he “saw the statue in the stone,” and that was why selecting the rock was as important as any other part of the process.

Many folks take great pains, to do their work in specific contexts, as that affects their creativity.

Creativity isn’t something that is easy to commoditize.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40917886

I meant that the medium doesn’t lock you into how others perceive you and your work. Not that mediums are interchangeable from the creator’s perspective.