Why not address the objective evidence the OP provided? To an impartial observer, it seemed quite overwhelming.
I don't want to comment on and single out any one participant, but please check out the rubric on how we did the grading: https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/kaggle-measuring-agi/ove...
Writeup quality is 20% of the total grade and there are other factors like dataset quality and results, which hold a much larger weight to the scores.
This has been made public to participants since day 1 of the launch and we've adhered very closely to this rubric:)
The data set quality and much of the methodology is just as abysmal as the writeup... as pointed out in my second post: https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/kaggle-measuring-agi/dis...
So it must have been the "results" that moved the needle :D
I don't want to comment on and single out any one participant, but please check out the rubric on how we did the grading: https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/kaggle-measuring-agi/ove...
Writeup quality is 20% of the total grade and there are other factors like dataset quality and results, which hold a much larger weight to the scores.
This has been made public to participants since day 1 of the launch and we've adhered very closely to this rubric:)
The data set quality and much of the methodology is just as abysmal as the writeup... as pointed out in my second post: https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/kaggle-measuring-agi/dis...
So it must have been the "results" that moved the needle :D