But they are not claiming that current models are better than humans but later developments might.
Do you think that a descendant of a fish could be a playwright or put on a play?
But they are not claiming that current models are better than humans but later developments might.
Do you think that a descendant of a fish could be a playwright or put on a play?
Objectively no. Fish form animals have been around far longer than mammals and we've touched the moon.
Well I would expect them to have been around for longer if they were to be ancestors of mammals.
Taking your logic to its conclusion fishes (or descendants of fish) regularly recite Shakespeare.
However there is a major flaw in your logic. Fishes (or their descendants) reciting Shakespeare is part of natural history. AI making quality music videos is just a prediction (or maybe even just wishful thinking). The former has occurred and has been observed, the later has not. So you are comparing nature with science fiction.
> Taking your logic to its conclusion fishes (or descendants of fish) regularly recite Shakespeare.
I believe that was the point.