I'm not interested in a technical conversation with you; I was answering someone else. The top voted comment thread of this page, which dominates discussion, already covers everything you'd want to know.
I'm not interested in a technical conversation with you; I was answering someone else. The top voted comment thread of this page, which dominates discussion, already covers everything you'd want to know.
Ah yeah, what I figured. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Don't get all mad when someone calls you out on it.
By the way, just so you have some concept of what the actual problem is despite your resistance to education:
Simply switching from processes to threads will not yield the claimed performance increases. A 300x improvement on analytic workflows? From a direct transliteration? Your BS alarms should be going off. They should be screaming "5 Alarm Fire".
The only way they got that increase was by breaking the synchronization mechanisms that provide ACID guarantees in Postgres, otherwise a direct rewrite would expect very similar performance.