> It should reject both the conspiracy theories of the right and the left. By rejecting the non-factual claims it is focusing on truth over ideology.

Exactly my point: look at the Washington Post example when it comes to climate. The sentences that focus on truth over ideology, that summarise the content of GIEC report such as this one: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6... , these neutral summaries are put in blue.

> No, that's a value judgement.

No. Have you read the GIEC reports?

> The climate changes all the time, for many reasons.

Really? It is what you are going for? Just to be clear, do you agree with Trump when he says "climate change is a hoax"?