While we are on the discussion I have mentioned a question at the end of the discussion around an assumption am trying, can you please check it out and see if you have any suggestions?
Hope this isnt too spicy a take, but i find it a bit disingenuous to use language that implies invention (and with no mention or citation of previous work), only to switch to dismissive language when someone notes a predecessor who you've apparently already heard of
Yeah yeah, I just found the idea kinda interesting so wanted to implement it
Keep exploring and writing (please ?) ! Love seeing people explore ... even after Fabrice Bellard had a go at it.
Ofcourse, am doing this just because I enjoy it.
While we are on the discussion I have mentioned a question at the end of the discussion around an assumption am trying, can you please check it out and see if you have any suggestions?
Would be awesome if someone can validate or help.
Hope this isnt too spicy a take, but i find it a bit disingenuous to use language that implies invention (and with no mention or citation of previous work), only to switch to dismissive language when someone notes a predecessor who you've apparently already heard of