> This is really odd taking two completely different things and trying to apply law against them. Hosting was somewhat protected by previous rulings, selling AI services is not.

What's different? What's not protected? And what's "hosting"? Where do you draw the line with "managed services"?

So if you use "AI" to hack a computer it is different to using "hosting" to put "illegal content"?

Are you implying 1 of them is legal? But both are for the judge to decide.

OR if this is about the provider -- who's selling AI services? It's LLM. Just running software on GPUs. There's no AI. There, done. Same.