I complain about LLM-slop a lot (see my comment history), but this one doesn't feel like one!

The only bit I thought could be LLM was:

> The gap in my tutoring setup wasn’t the quality of the instruction. It was two structural things.

Even here, the second sentence is quite weak, none of that stupid punchy sentence that LLM likes to copy from (probably) TED Talks because it thinks that'll make the text fucking profound.