Cloudflare: let's give the bots their own accounts so they can scrape harder.
Also Cloudflare: let's send normal humans who are trying to go about their daily lives into endless Turnstile spinner loops with absolutely zero recourse, grievance, or support infrastructure.
Just had 10 rounds of busses, motorcycles and fire hydrants with Google before I decided I don't actually want to see that page so much. So Cloudflare is unfortunately not the only offender here.
I had the same thing, it really feels like Google is punishing me for not signing in and not using Chrome.
I had similar thoughts: "let's convince everyone to outsource the decision on who can access their websites to us, because BOTS BOTS BOTS" and "let's make life easier for bots to do things".
First you spread the disease, then you sell the cure.
I think this is more of a “keep friends close but enemies closer” type thing.
Sounds more like “let’s make money twice”.
It's business so they have neither enemies nor friends, just various breeds of cattle to milk.
I’d love a chrome extension to measure just how many times per day I’m met with the Turnstile.
Turnstiles per minute.
If all bots are subject to a rate limit, then the system works as designed. Especially if site operators can block bot accounts. Requiring accounts is one of the easiest solutions for that problem. One of the large issues with scrapers is that they pretend to be normal internet visitors that never visited your site before, because any bot that stored cookies would immediately be rate limited by basic config.
Turnstile isn't something Cloudflare put up to annoy you. It's what the website owners decided to put up, for many different reasons.
In the same vein, Anubis has a default configuration that lets honest scrapers and crawlers through, because those can easily be rejected by basic web server configurations. Only scrapers pretending to be browsers need to solve the proof-of-work puzzle. You can disable that feature, of course.
Cloudflare may play this smart: force bots to pay for access, then take 30% of the cut and give the rest to the website owners. That way, websites get paid when the AI slop machine digests their content. Normal visitors get in for free, turn the scraper hellscape into a sustainable model. Bonus points for letting websites set their own rates (pre-declared to scrapers, of course) to dissuade all but the most interested scrapers.
> Cloudflare may play this smart: force bots to pay for access
https://developers.cloudflare.com/agents/tools/payments/
But think of the shareholders
Anyone can be a shareholder.
Said the rich swe, fully oblivious of many who struggle to feed their own children.
I thought there were no rich swes anymore?
That's unnecessarily presumptuous.
Cloudflare is in the S&P500. If you have a 401k diversified in broad market indexes then most likely… you are a shareholder.
About half of US households don’t have any retirement at all. Making their point that “shareholders” are a distinct class separate from the whole of the population.
and sitll the US seems to be one of the biggest markets educated on "being a shareholder" im sure Europe has smaller percentage of them.
Yup. Over this side of the pond, stock market is this weird socially acceptable gambling for rich people.
This sounds like Elon’s IPO…I give you 0.000000000009% of my company for your whole savings account. Now have a part of the pie!
> About half of US households don’t have any retirement at all.
...and the top 10% by wealth own 90% of the stock market.
So even among the half that do have retirement savings in 401ks and the like it is on average very little compared to how much the truly wealthy have invested.
No, Cloudflare does not meet the criteria for inclusion in the S&P 500.
Interesting... I wanted to prove you wrong but it looks like you are right: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_S%26P_500_companies
Are you still reading webpages personally instead telling your AI to do it?
Maybe your agent could have a little blog where it keeps a diary of cool pages it read for you? And then you subscribe to that?
Interesting idea ... doesn't fit my style of content consumption, but it might fit yours.
I went for a personal newsfeed, agent pulls news form ~100 feeds related to my interests. Then reads all articles for me and orders them by how interesting they might be for me. I specifically asked for vector embeddings, up/down votes (-2..+2), visited status, LLM content evaluation. Probably there are some other mechanisms I didn't even bother to check. It's a work in progress but I can see myself replacing most of my news reading with it. For many news the AI summary, which contains main idea behind the item is enough for me. As a bonus it resolves clickbait and is quite good at it. Also no ads, ever. For sure I need to implement some grouping because when the popular story breaks I have many stories about the same thing with mostly overlapping details. AI merging them would be quite cool.
I also asked AI to extract my interests from my browsing/watching histories of my all accounts. V2 of my newsfeed might utilize that somehow for better results.
Silly thing is I made it in one afternoon with my only motivation of being slightly more annoyed with the web on that day.
Particular model or LLM that you use?
I'm sure they don't want humans to have that experience - the issue is that the human behavior looks very bot-like. This is usually only experienced by people whose setup is peculiar
It's a clean way to charge AI to read content too.