this isn't an achievement, it's yet another amateur crank claiming he solved a famous puzzle, without a paper and without any critical review. many people have claimed to decode Linear A before. just because this guy used an LLM doesn't make it more credible
He has a working draft of a manuscript that may form the basis of a scholarly article, it has been shared with experts, and there is an excerpt of the paper in my blog post. I have also seen and read the paper with my own 2 eyes, I can't publish it though, Tom wants to keep that under wraps while it's reviewed by linguistics experts.
> He has a working draft of a manuscript that may form the basis of a scholarly article, it has been shared with experts
So did many of the previous attempted solvers.
One way to assess the validity of prior claims is to see how many words you can translate using their proposed system.
the info provided is completely unverifiable.