> The mistrust of private individuals and companies is a harmful belief

the full body MRI was developed in the NHS/university along with CT scanners. But let us not pretend that modern companies have been acting in a way that is ethical. OR that there exists a legal framework that fights for the rights of normal people.

> incidentalomas may be much less of a problem if you can keep a close eye on them without using CT or MRI

They are a problem because we have no real data on cancer incidents that don't develop. (https://ima.org.uk/24626/making-sense-of-cancer-with-profess... buried in this article)

Biopsies are not risk free. General anaesthetic carries a risk. You'll be on antibiotics, the wound will have an infection risk. Also the build up of scar tissue is a real issue.

This is the ethical issue. Because suspicious lumps will need investigation, no ethics board is going to allow not investigating.

This also fucks up the data.

Its not impossible, but it needs sensible thought, thought from actual medical professionals, rather than a company who is at best operating in a legal grey zone.