per that rationale, since contributions are valued solely by the relative capital value they generate, do you think it would make sense to define the value of a person solely by the value of their contributions?
per that rationale, since contributions are valued solely by the relative capital value they generate, do you think it would make sense to define the value of a person solely by the value of their contributions?
Classic trolley problem: there are about 1.1 million high school teachers in the US. Collectively, they produce less GDP than Elon Musk...
But apparently Elon is more valuable, so goodbye high schools, choo-choo.