I feel like using Fable in the name is a mistake, who knows how long that model will be around.

You could call it aiproductsexchange.com

Bold move leaving out the dash between words a la experts-exchange lol.

thatsthejoke.jpg

expertsexchange.com was a site from the before times.

I wondered if it was intentional, but thought I would double down on it in case people missed it.

Was the dashless domain really a site (or the site) at one point?

It was dashless for many years.

As dashless and pointed as https://penisland.net/ !

always have a backup plan (:

Without the sex change in them : AIProductMarket.com, AIProductHub.com, AIProductMarketplace.com, AIToolMarket.com, AIToolsHub.com

That misses the point entirely....

I don't think using the name Fable is wrong, but I think a pool of Fables should be called a Grimm, or possibly an Aesop.

Perhaps Grimoire?

"A grimoire is a textbook of magic and sorcery. Traditionally, it contains instructions for casting spells, performing divination, creating magical objects like talismans, and summoning supernatural entities such as angels or spirits."

Seems to fit.

It's how they name classes of models, presumably this implies something about the relative quantization / size of model, not about the specific performance. E.g. Fabel 5 will be better than Opus 5, better than Sonnet 5, etc. The 5 is the version number of the particular iteration / training run at this class of model.

I think they mean: I feel like using [Sonnet/Opus/Fable] in the name [URL] is a mistake, who knows how long that model will be around

But it sounds like FableFool so it has that going for it.

Even if that product disappears, OpenAI will never Anthropic forget it.