Thanks for the pointer! I posted here before properly exploring the other themes.
Really nice project. Thank you for contributing to the OSM community.
>Editing geometries is out of scope for this project.
Out of curiosity, may I ask why?
It's not that I have this use case regularly, cycling-related it mainly comes up dealing with tracks through forests and fields.
Excellent question!
First: editing _attributes_ of geometries is totally possible, editing the _shape_ of geometries is not possible with MapComplete.
If one allows to edit shapes (aka: geometries), this means that one can draw or move lines around - for example: add/move a cyclepath. A contributor might thus move a line into another geometry (such as a building). But as MapComplete has focused maps, they might not be shown to this contributor!
Allowing to edit geomtry shapes this implies I should show all _other_ lines and polygons (e.g. forests, streams, buildings, ...) to avoid incorrect intersection.
The point of MapComplete is to keep it simple and focussed on a single topic. Showing all geometries is counter to that. On top of that, we already have an excellent tool which handles geometry drawing: the iD editor you'll find on openstreetmap.org/edit .
One could also argue that creating/moving points (which can be done with MapComplete) could also cause data errors; but the 'add new point'-wizard has some steps to invite to add with high accuraccy. And even if someone adds a point in a wrong location (e.g. in a building instead of outside of it), the impact of a misplaced point is generally way less then that of a misplaced line or area.