It is an access issue. If you could get step by step instructions on how to modify a virus so it kills all people over 6ft you bet your ass there would be people attempting it.

> It is an access issue

Column A, Column B. Building a small explosive device isn't hard. Building a million is very difficult, doing it covertly virtually impossible without the resources of a nation-state.

The problem with biologics is the self-assembly and replication machinery comes for "free." So the numpties who might otherwise blow up a trash can [1] now have a real chance of taking out a million people.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_New_York_and_New_Jersey_b...

They would still have to procure things that would (I hope) light up many screens before they're able to. And such numpties are probably already monitored, or in prison for some other stupid life decision.

I also would like to hope that people that are likely to do such things are probably:

A) don't know how to break even the most basic guardrails of models

B) already in glasswings project

To prove point B - Theranos existed.

> They would still have to procure things that would (I hope) light up many screens before they're able to

“Many of the largest and most responsible providers in the industry already screen and record orders voluntarily,” but there is no requirement to do so [1].

[1] https://screendna.org/

> ...you bet your ass...

Humorously, whether I choose to participate in this hypothetical or not, I am already betting my ass.

This whole situation feels like the game [1].

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Game_(mind_game)

Why. That was just uncalled for. Sigh

I guess in this theoretical "AI makes weapon" scenario one could use the same AI to make defences too?

// Claude, make antiviral nanobots that defend me from 6ft virus. Make no mistakes.

I don’t know if you’re being silly but it is orders of magnitudes easier to modify an existing virus to selectively target certain snps than make “antiviral nanobots”