So instead of adressing the article and provide the potential base for a intelligent debate, you decided to raise the bar by lamenting?

My impression in general is that there is rather a very EU friendly view here on HN in general, but HN is critical of everything.

So I also say, lot's of nice words, great that they at least start so late with that now, but more concrete steps would be more welcome.

"Making public administrations anchor users and contributors to open source, through procurement guidance, open-source friendly tendering, strengthening the Open Source Programme Office and its networks, reusable public digital assets and by embedding openness and sovereignty in digital investment decisions"

Because this for example sounds great. But is it very concrete? It sounds like it, but I don't see how it is.