Except you provided no argument. Explain why the AI gang, like a rich kid who run a high debt at the Casino, during their drunken weekend in Vegas...is frenetically calling on daddy US to bail them out:
"US officials eye government stakes in AI companies" - https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/us-officials-eye...
"Trump to meet AI leaders to discuss US investment in their companies" - https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98r8r7dz5no
They are facing a Capex of 2 to 3 trillion until 2030, and have now realized they are out of money.
[flagged]
I see...So the argument is not wrong because you refuted it... instead because you promoted yourself to the position of deciding which claims are allowed to be subjected to scrutiny and evidence. :-))
"What we know about the plan to give Americans an equity stake in AI" - https://www.ft.com/content/8559a3f9-86de-4a1c-8a75-6623e83e6...
"OpenAI discussed government loan guarantees for chip plants, not data centers, Altman says" - https://www.reuters.com/business/openai-does-not-want-govern...