Interesting. Being EU-based is a huge plus over Kagi in my opinion.

I also like that they don't ask any personal data, even email address. I like services that don't want any personal details. Like with Mullvad, where they just give you a random number and that's your account ID <3 Unfortunately Mullvad enshittified in other ways so I had to move to ProtonVPN. But services that act like that are great IMO. Unfortunately a lot of services apply "Know your Customer" BS even though they are not in the financial sector.

However I wonder where they get their search data from. But it's worth investigating.

It should be clear in the FAQ. All Europe-based. Our current search providers:

- Mojeek - EUSP - Marginalia - Linkup - Serper (the only non-EU, being UK and proxying Google) - Uruky Site Search (our own index) - Pixabay (images)

I'd be curious to hear about your Mullvad experience (feel free to email me).

Well Mullvad stopped providing port forwarding, which is necessary for good torrent support (especially if you use public torrents and you need ones that aren't seeded a lot).

They also stopped supporting openvpn which I need. Wireguard only now.

It's not enshittification in terms of ads etc but it is reduction of possibilities because they already make enough money on the people using the main features.

But anyway I rely on both things so I moved over.

What's the reason you need OpenVPN?

I use a hardware router with really nice encryption offloading that does not support wireguard but does support openvpn natively.

This router is in front of my 'arrrrr' subnet at home, where all my leeching servers live. This way sidechannel attacks don't work because they have no alternative path to the internet.

It's a nice setup and I have no wish to change it or to buy other hardware.

mullvad stopped providing port forwarding due to the abuse and the effects a single-digit percent of their users was having on the other 90+% of users.

not because they "already make enough money on the people using the main features" or "enshittification".

its kind of like the opposite of enshittification, actually, seeing how it made the service better for the majority of their users.

Maybe the term is wrong but I really disliked this move. They should just have taken more active measures to combat abuse, which is something all providers have to deal with.

One example: They could have done port forwarding just on UDP. Which would still have allowed torrents (the main usecase for port forwarding) but blocked any kind of webhosting via VPN.

But for me the service got distinctly shittier so for me I think this term qualifies.