Here is some engagement: your project may be hard to engage with unless someone is highly motivated?

> "this is because `enough` imposes very few paradigms on your wordflows -- in a world of exponential possibility, most people have as many things they want to do as ways they prefer to do them."

OK, but, having read the GitHub and the reverse chronology discourse, but not doing the install, I cannot immediately tell what anyone's wordflow might be or whether this could be helpful in any way.

Usually from looking at a project I can imagine a venn diagram of things I want to do and things the thing does. Not here. Also, I felt I was pointed to principles, but rather than principles of the tools purpose, I found motivations for the author and meta comments about the discourse site itself, rather than motivations to use the tool or comments on its application to authoring assistance.

Rather than those, ironically the best entry point seems to be the agent guide:

https://github.com/0gsd/enough/blob/main/docs/AGENT_GUIDE_v0...

From there it appears you're trying to make a combination of humane/verbal human-driving-the-loop document reviser (e.g. the colored text visualizer and agentic tool to grab references by color for other tool consideration), and a substrate (cough) for arbitrary "paradigms" of working towards producing writing of a given "motivation". From there, one goes into the `defaults` to find translation and text planning paradigms:

https://github.com/0gsd/enough/blob/main/defaults/paradigms/...

https://github.com/0gsd/enough/blob/main/defaults/paradigms/...

While the spelunking approach can give the idea, is there any writeup anywhere that walks someone through the concept and an applied example from the POV of the human who made this?

I note non-ironically the text planner has no explainer in the example document types. :-)