> Jokes aside I find it hard to trust in the amount of things Anthropic throws out. It can’t be a well thought out and stable product this way.
I've never seen any company iterate on a product as quickly as Anthropic has with Claude. When you drill down into the details, it is well thought out and stable and well documented.
It seems the feedback loop is so fast, they address issues before they can fester into major problems. The entire company uses Claude; there's not better dogfooding than that.
It reminds me of how, back in the day, when continuous integration and continuous deployment were new; it seemed nuts to push code to production every day. And now, it's the norm.
I don't believe you deserve the downvotes you're getting. Sometimes a good joke is so good that it appears shallow at first glance, but only upon reflection does the true humor show through. A shallow callout such as yours is sometimes necessary to call the reader back to it for that further reflection.
- it’s against HN guidelines to comment on downvotes
- comments are supposed to be substantive, further the discussion, and inspire curiosity (and I think the joke failed at all of those)
- it’s not a great joke, just a shallow pun
I’m guilty of often downvoting jokes on HN that are just jokes with no substance, partly because they end up causing confusion and noise, and they make the discussion less interesting. Reddit is a great place for those.
given their recent speech, I’m sure theyre trying
Jokes aside I find it hard to trust in the amount of things Anthropic throws out. It can’t be a well thought out and stable product this way.
> Jokes aside I find it hard to trust in the amount of things Anthropic throws out. It can’t be a well thought out and stable product this way.
I've never seen any company iterate on a product as quickly as Anthropic has with Claude. When you drill down into the details, it is well thought out and stable and well documented.
It seems the feedback loop is so fast, they address issues before they can fester into major problems. The entire company uses Claude; there's not better dogfooding than that.
It reminds me of how, back in the day, when continuous integration and continuous deployment were new; it seemed nuts to push code to production every day. And now, it's the norm.
sorry to post a shallow comment but this is a really excellent joke holy shit. well done.
I am sorry for my ignorance, but I don’t understand the joke. What does the pope have to do with this?
The Pope is selected by the College of Cardinals. The joke is a play on "cardinality."
also colah was invited by the literal pope to his encyclical https://www.anthropic.com/news/chris-olah-pope-leo-encyclica...
[dead]
I don't believe you deserve the downvotes you're getting. Sometimes a good joke is so good that it appears shallow at first glance, but only upon reflection does the true humor show through. A shallow callout such as yours is sometimes necessary to call the reader back to it for that further reflection.
A few thoughts on this:
- it’s against HN guidelines to comment on downvotes
- comments are supposed to be substantive, further the discussion, and inspire curiosity (and I think the joke failed at all of those)
- it’s not a great joke, just a shallow pun
I’m guilty of often downvoting jokes on HN that are just jokes with no substance, partly because they end up causing confusion and noise, and they make the discussion less interesting. Reddit is a great place for those.