> # do an expensive and extremely thorough review (reliably catches >99% of bugs, costs $3-20 per review depending on complexity):

/code-review ultra

main suggestion would be to sound a lot less optimistic about that it finds 99% of bugs or that its at all thorough, and instead list that it is time capped, and will only find bugs that you explicitly tell it to look for.

i used my three runs of ultrareview.

the first run with no other prompting found a couple typos in markdown only

the second one i prompted it with several themes of known open bugs in the code, and it found 6 items

and then the third one i ran after doing an actual long audit through gemini to make a much more detailed prompt about issues in the code

and for that one, instead of doing an exhaustive run, it just never started, so no idea if it worked

but the experience had no relation at all with the reliability or thoroughness claims