Occam's razor ("Entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity")?
I mean, God, isn't one enough? Honestly, it's too much for me!
Occam's razor ("Entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity")?
I mean, God, isn't one enough? Honestly, it's too much for me!
Let's settle on having three then.
(If you had just one, it would look pretty silly calling himself father and praying to himself.)
By that argument zero is sufficient.
In nature everything has a opposite or opponent. That would make at least two.
Show me the opposite, or the opponent, of a black hole.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_hole
I said show me, not point me at a hypothetical entity with no known pathway to reified existence.
> hypothetical entity with no known pathway to reified existence.
More realistic than god.
> More realistic than god.
No argument there, but “in nature everything has an opposite” is just as illogical; many things have no opposite, thus it’s not “at least two” it’s zero asshole gods in a nihilistic atheistic universe, one asshole god in a true monotheistic universe, one neutered god and one not-quite god representing the bit that’s been neutered off in a false monotheistic universe, one good god and one bad god in a morally balanced duotheistic universe (looks identical to the zero god(s) option), or a variable number of variably asshole gods in a polytheistic universe.