This is some late-stage capitalist cope. Money goes to the person who can hoodwink people into thinking their product will do something they care about, not the person with the product that actually does something people want. There are a litany of examples of people swearing up and down by products that have been scientifically proven to __DO NOTHING__. The correlation between popularity and quality is tenuous AT BEST.

> Money goes to the person who can hoodwink people into thinking their product will do something they care about

So Google, MS, FB, OpenAI could not "hoodwink" people?

MS is hoodwinking people all day long brother, just not in AI.