I’ve thought about this. Or at least something like that.
When reading dune there’s a class of women who can control their biochemistry in such a way that they can eg prolong lifespan, or anything else within the realm of feasible biochemistry.
Here I was like: how does the nervous system function in that way? How could signals from the mind control the behavior of molecules?
The mind cannot itself feel pain, similarly the mind has sensory limits within the body. As argued in a book called the body a guide for occupants: cancer is a very good example of a disease that our nervous system should be able to detect but for whatever reason we don’t, probably because cancer is something we can only now treat.
Not all of the body can be made legible to the mind.
Although maybe a better question: why don’t we have a dedicated organ that can sample blood with laboratory like precision and make anomalies available to the conscious mind beyond whatever faculties we currently have?
PS
One thing that definitely should be within the realm of conscious control: body fat. There are ways of forcing the body to metabolize more fat for energy and the biggest problem is managing excess heart (easily becomes lethal). But this could be super useful in cold climates. Imagine being able to literally burn body fat to stay warm? The amount of heat that can be released is enormous. Nowadays most of us could probably afford the otherwise superfluous expenditure of body fat (beyond essential functions).
> why don’t we have a dedicated organ that can sample blood with laboratory like precision and make anomalies available to the conscious mind beyond whatever faculties we currently have?
"My triglycerides are at 220 mg/dL" is not a useful signal to a hominid banging rocks together.
Instead, what we got was the budget version, keyed for resolution rather than understanding: thirst (osmolality of plasma fluid), suffocation (blood acidity induced by excess CO2), and when all else fails, at least vague malaise as a catch-all "something's off, let's maybe sit down."
> One thing that definitely should be within the realm of conscious control: body fat. There are ways of forcing the body to metabolize fat for energy and the biggest problem is managing excess heart (easily becomes lethal). But this could be super useful in cold climates.
Non-shivering thermogenesis is primarily mediated by brown fat. It's how babies keep warm. Adults still retain some brown fat, and it appears spending time in the cold can stimulate its production. https://stagetestdomain3.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-ma...
> Imagine being able to literally burn body fat for heat? Nowadays most of us could probably afford the otherwise superfluous expenditure of body fat.
Brown fat is burned in the body by a protein called thermogenin (UCP1). The same process can be stimulated by the drug 2,4-Dinitrophenol (DNP), albeit to lethal consequences if you're not careful. I suppose the reason we can't do this at will is because our body can do it unconsciously for us better and more safely than our frontal cortex ever could.
> suffocation (blood acidity induced by excess CO2)
Which, being the budget option, has a failure scenario: When low oxygen occurs without high CO2, people feel fine... until it's too late and they fall over, unconscious.
This can occur in enclosed spaces like caves where some other gas-mix has excluded the oxygen, or when someone hyperventilates before holding their breath.
> This chemoreceptor patent-proposal is kicking my ass. Hundley won't let me down until it's done. Hardly worth filing for, in my opinion. Who wants to smell the difference between xenon and radon?
-- Complaining Versalife employee, Deus Ex (2000)
> This can occur in enclosed spaces like caves where some other gas-mix has excluded the oxygen
Maybe this why some people innate fear of caves, primordial adaptation for suffocation avoidance behavior. I don't know, just fun to wonder about things like that
I would wager a much-bigger feedback loop involves the other creatures that would like to live in those caves and the odds you might get into conflict with them.
The brain doesn't directly control a whole lot of basic functions, other then breathing. It is entirely possible to keep a brain-dead person alive using little more than a feeding tube and forcing air into the lungs.
> Although maybe a better question: why don’t we have a dedicated organ that can sample blood with laboratory like precision and make anomalies available to the conscious mind beyond whatever faculties we currently have?
Because random mutations and selective pressure has never lead to such a trait that persists in a population.
We've never seen randon mutation and selective pressure ever really build anything, only trigger and exploit existing adaptive rulesets... pushed to extremes mutations may often yield a benefit in a narrow situation but at some greater cost, like throwing the backseats out of your car helps you accelerate faster, but reduces the overall utility and flexibility of the use of the vehicle. Im sure if we started honestly looking at organic systems as the product of thought, it would yield a greater understanding of them that we would be able to leverage in industry.