> This decision seems to based more in politics than engineering.

You are 100% right. This is a decision made on VIBES and not evidence. The proof is here:

> Bun was recently rewritten in Rust using Claude, and its development seems to have taken a turn towards being fully vibe-coded. This is alarming and disappointing for a number of reasons, and frankly it seems like a future headache that we'd prefer to avoid.

They haven't tested it, they haven't found a single problem. They just don't like AI code and they're clearly saying "the fact that the project tested every line of code and it passes all tests doesn't matter to us. The fact that it's vide coded by people who literally make coding LLMs also doesn't matter."

Pure ego, no data.

So a vibed decision to reject vibed code. Minus minus equals plus?

I think you should read what the bun devs published about their process. It's not just vibed.

Care to share a link? There are 0 posts on Bun blog, or the GitHub page README announcing/explaining the rational for the rewrite, or project direction

[dead]