Thank you for the downvotes.

You're moving the debate here. The question was "How are the goals different?" from the project leader (who ought to know better), not whether moving them makes sense.

Well I guess you think the important part of the goals is to make censorship technically difficult, without regard to if the software actually facilitates political speech at all.

Others could argue that software nobody uses for its stated purpose has failed; but you are right that is technically a different discussion than the one you started.

> The question was "How are the goals different?"

A question you haven't answered.