My point is they can still influence the US even if they / their money isn’t there.
Do you really live in that much of a US-centric bubble where you don’t realise outside influence exists?
My point is they can still influence the US even if they / their money isn’t there.
Do you really live in that much of a US-centric bubble where you don’t realise outside influence exists?
>they can still influence the US even if they / their money isn’t there.
Sure, but I wager not being in the US means less money. And thus less influence
> Do you really live in that much of a US-centric bubble where you don’t realise outside influence exists?
Adding any friction to their influence is a good thing, in my eyes.