I find it really troubling finance are relying on LLMs (word generators!) for financial analysis - I mean I guess it means there will never be any annoying gaps in the data.
I find it really troubling finance are relying on LLMs (word generators!) for financial analysis - I mean I guess it means there will never be any annoying gaps in the data.
Depends on how it’s done.
I use it a lot now for knocking up grafana charts etc. It’s not so much that the LLM is feeding the numbers through. You can still use real tools to analyse and summarise the numbers, it’s just much quicker at driving them.
As ever with data analysis, two things will continue to be true. Real insights come from spotting something that looks off and digging into it deeper. Secondly, it’s really easy to connect data in a misleading way.
I’ve had a Claude analysis handed to me this morning including a summary list of actions we’re going to take next which falls into this very trap.
The insights you’ll get from your data will only be as deep as the curiosity of the person at the helm.