Yes. Isn’t effective regulation of dangerous products wonderful.

Effective in that its easily bypassed, and dangerous insofar as the government appears to be happy for the use to continue as long as kids use their dogs face to bypass it.

Of course, when you point this out they step into "Oh but we knew it wouldn't work immediately" which is so silly its staggering.

But of course, the technology has been applied immediately to moral panic stuff like porn also.

It is, provided there is a broad consensuss of experts in the field who agree on the danger and what to about it, the government regulates based on that information and that the regulation is effective.

Apart from those things, the Australian government did an excellent job.

Who are the experts in the field, and who decides they're experts?

"More doctors smoke camels than any other cigarette".