Why would they do it like this? It makes no real sense to me. At that point it's an entirely different project, with the same functionality.
If you use Bun in production, does this feel like a well managed upstream?
I don't use Bun, I don't care that they are using an LLM (though it is impressive that this actually worked), but the project management aspects of this is just wacky.
Why would they do it like this? It makes no real sense to me. At that point it's an entirely different project, with the same functionality.
If you use Bun in production, does this feel like a well managed upstream?
I don't use Bun, I don't care that they are using an LLM (though it is impressive that this actually worked), but the project management aspects of this is just wacky.
Because Anthropic owns Bun and they use it for marketing purposes.
The really interesting thing to do would be to ask the agents to submit the diff as a coherent patchset...
> "The codebase is otherwise largely the same. The same architecture, the same data structures."
Ship of Theseus.
except it's more like someone used the Philosopher's Stone to turn all the wood bits into metal
And 6700 commits.
No wonder GitHub is down
/s
That OpenClaw guy seems to make 6000 commits everyday or something.
No /s needed