The individual is his own construction company in this scenario. Just like the construction company has to advertise itself to keep getting contracts, here the individual has to do the same with employers. The analogy is not superficial.
The individual is his own construction company in this scenario. Just like the construction company has to advertise itself to keep getting contracts, here the individual has to do the same with employers. The analogy is not superficial.
The analogy is superficial because it makes absolutely no sense. Analogies are supposed to be analogous.
You want the company to share surplus with you but you won't share your surplus with construction workers. Is that fair?