Is it just me, or the article structure and subtitles feel very AI?

The first half wasn't too bad, but the AI tells get strong in the second half.

The tell I always spot is it's propensity to bold random words frankly.

Yes, and it becomes unbearable after a while.

I don’t get it. Unlike a lot of the technical article slop that is posted here, this obviously had a lot of human thought and effort put into the prompt.

The LLM pass (unsurprisingly) made it worse.

For example:

The results were conclusive: 100% pass rate, showing Reno recovered cleanly after the loss phase, and revealing that this is a CUBIC-related bug.

Look, I’m reading a description of a Linux kernel network congestion bug. I don’t need the hand-holding.