The total lack of principles and consistency in public is all you need to know about the lower standard that will apply when they implement it in private.
> I won't be surprised if one of Trump's goals isn't so much to make AI safer as it is to ensure that the answers AI gives are the ones he and his regime want people to see. Today, for example, when I asked a variety of chatbots who lost the 2020 election, they all agreed Trump had lost. Funnily enough, when the Senate Judiciary Committee asked numerous Trump nominees for federal judgeships the same question, they universally refused to say he lost.
I'm a little confused. I thought conservatives in general, and Trump in particular, emphasized "cutting red tape" and reducing regulation. What am I, a staunch conservative, to believe in and advocate?
It wasn't clear to me from the article if this was a Trump directive/mood swing, or if Kevin Hassett is freelancing. In this administration, it's important to understand who's actually doing the current thing.
The total lack of principles and consistency in public is all you need to know about the lower standard that will apply when they implement it in private.
> I won't be surprised if one of Trump's goals isn't so much to make AI safer as it is to ensure that the answers AI gives are the ones he and his regime want people to see. Today, for example, when I asked a variety of chatbots who lost the 2020 election, they all agreed Trump had lost. Funnily enough, when the Senate Judiciary Committee asked numerous Trump nominees for federal judgeships the same question, they universally refused to say he lost.
I'm a little confused. I thought conservatives in general, and Trump in particular, emphasized "cutting red tape" and reducing regulation. What am I, a staunch conservative, to believe in and advocate?
It wasn't clear to me from the article if this was a Trump directive/mood swing, or if Kevin Hassett is freelancing. In this administration, it's important to understand who's actually doing the current thing.