I’m an incredibly bold guy. And I would personally just stop operating in the EU if it was between that and being accountable to their bureaucrats.
I’m an incredibly bold guy. And I would personally just stop operating in the EU if it was between that and being accountable to their bureaucrats.
So you don't want to be accountable to users, or to bureaucrats? If you had to choose one who would it be?
Might be tough for a Florida-man to understand but there's a difference between being bold and being an a-hole.
Yeah, that's a very... interesting definition of "bold". One might argue that since operating inside a regulated environment is so out of his comfort zone, setting up shop in the EU would be the bold thing to do.
Maybe I’ll set up shop in the EU one day :)
Will you welcome me with open arms as long as I warn my users that my app uses cookies?
Nobody's holding a gun to your head, you're welcome to setup shop in the most anarchist society you can find. Good luck with whatever version of "operating" you're able to manage while there :)
Why would I move to London?
Despite Brexit propaganda, the UK still has bureaucrats and regulation. Try again :)
Edit: in case this was an attempted swipe at me, I'm not British, btw ;)
London is safer than many american cities, what are you talking about?
edit: removed snark
You do know that "the bureaucrats" is just a slur for our democratically elected government, right?
In other words, the will of the people.
Yeah but the opponents of the people literally believe democracy is bad and want to go back to monarchism in the form of unaccountable CEO kings that decide the will of the people.
Sadly this is like half the tech workforce too. People too brainwashed to see how destructive their work is to the world.
I believe it is up to the other half to stand up for decency, for democracy and for the rule of law.
Don't be quiet, don't just let things happen. Use your voice while you still have it!
I am actively working on several senate and congressional campaigns, believe me that these people want to actively imprison some of these CEOs for the destruction they wrought upon the world too. These stump speeches tend to get the crowds most riled up too. :D
Thuper thcary. I’m shaking in my boots. My timbers are completely and utterly shivered.
I'm not trying to scare you, just letting you know I'm someone that does more than advocacy. I'm actively organizing with people that share my values.
It's a great feeling, definitely a defining human trait that everyone should experience.
Hopefully you find your tribe someday.
Bonding with leftists over fantasies of throwing your opposition in jail. I doubt any of that is even real, but if it is, that’s sad.
If it makes you feel better to pretend I’m not surrounded by love, then by all means, add that to the pile of things you’re pretending.
Why don't you want to talk to me about London anymore D:
Please don't twist language in semantic games.
Once you work to demolish democracy, you are not the opposition in the sense that democracies use the word - e.g. somebody who disagrees with government policy, but not with the constitutional order itself.
You instead become an enemy of democracy and of our society.
Democratic states have defense mechanisms against that sort of putschist - jail is not some fantasy, but a natural consequence.
I wouldn't take them too seriously, there's strong indication that they're just trolling for the lols and aren't interested in an actually substantive discussion.
The far-right is never just joking or doing things for the lols. It is a thin shield to prevent being called out.
https://www.npr.org/2021/04/26/990274685/how-extremists-weap...
I'm not convinced this person is far-right, but even so there are smarter ways of repudiating them, that's all I'm saying.
What? Of course it isn't! I mean, I guess you could argue that it's technically a slur in the sense that it is disparaging, but obviously the guy knows that he's being disparaging- you use that word to draw connection to identitarian slurs which are inherently wrong, and bureaucrat is not that. It also refers specifically and exclusively to the parts of the government that aren't democratically elected; the opposite of what you're saying.
Even setting that aside, 'the fat cheeto and his deplorable clowns in congress' is a slur for a democratically elected government, "the will of the people". So what? We shouldn't be allowed to insult a democratically elected government for some reason? Democracies are certainly preferable to autocracies, but that doesn't mean 'democratically elected' is a synonym for 'good'.
"you use that word to draw connection to identitarian slurs which are inherently wrong" you are reading into this too much, slur is often used as a word for a general insult.
Doesn't make a lot of sense to me to respond to 'I don't want to deal with their bureaucrats' with 'You do realize that's an insult, right?'. Yeah, he realizes, he is clearly trying to be insulting. It's only an insult because of that intent, in fact. A lot more sensible if the intent is to suggest that the word ought not be used because it is an insult beyond what is acceptable in polite society, which is the much more common usage of 'slur'.
Not to say it's impossible you're right that it's being brought up irrelevantly, but I do think the odds are on my side and I further think it would be worth writing a sentence calling that out even if they weren't.
His point, I assume, was that many people insulting beurocrats think that those are somehow seperate from the people they elected i.e. it's not some unidentifiable blob responsible for these things but the person /you/ voted for. At least that's my charitable interpretation.