Wait, why isn't that the article instead? Who actually wants this fade-scroll-thing? It detracts from the sensible content.
even this "ascii" (i expected raw text but still got html+css) was hardly readable for me, had to reach to the reader view, finally readable, ohh... looks much like ai-generated, why did i spend so much time jumping over obstacles...
The length and rambling nature of it was a clear AI indicator.
This is unfortunately the problem with the Boring Internet. It's subject to the common denominator which is shite. And LLMs generate a lot of that.
CSS always counters the conceptual and philosophical use of hypertext.
Color contrast in the text version isn’t great either
even this "ascii" (i expected raw text but still got html+css) was hardly readable for me, had to reach to the reader view, finally readable, ohh... looks much like ai-generated, why did i spend so much time jumping over obstacles...
The length and rambling nature of it was a clear AI indicator.
This is unfortunately the problem with the Boring Internet. It's subject to the common denominator which is shite. And LLMs generate a lot of that.
CSS always counters the conceptual and philosophical use of hypertext.
Color contrast in the text version isn’t great either