I'm not sure what "the evidence" is in this case?

I mean, we have lots of people using LLMs to write software in different ways, as we explore this space. I don't really see how "the evidence" can be different from "anecdotes" at this stage of the exploration?

There have been a couple of studies done on LLM-assisted dev vs non-LLM-assisted dev, but the author doesn't cite them.