Despite not publicly moving away from what has been said about Sam*
Jessica Livingston's personal stake in OpenAI is maybe at most 0.1% or less and Paul Graham's, afaik, is 0.
So the bias doesn't seem as large as OP thinks
*https://xcancel.com/paulg/status/2041366050693173393
And "toughness, adaptability, and determination" >>> "ambition", frankly
Such suspicious phrasing lol. So you’re saying Paul Graham and his wife Jessica have 800 MILLION dollars worth of OpenAI stock, and that’s not so significant?
We're forced to decide whether 0.8B is enough to risk her credibility over, or, if it matters to us, gather more information first
Has The Information broken any critical news about OpenAI? I never connected the dots around why I started finding it increasingly in worth paying for over the last year or two, but editorial bias feels correct.
Exactly! It's only $0.0008T. Pocket change really...
What is 0.1% of a trillion? I think that's quite a large number still.
Only a Sith deals in absolutes...
OpenAI’s last post-money valuation was less than a trillion. They’ll probably cross that point in the future, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves.
It was $852 billion - 0.1% of which is $852 million
Can only buy a luxury mega yacht, few mansions and private jets, but let's be real, after this you're lucky if you're left with just enough to buy yourself an European football club.
85.2m*
Are you sure?
Does Paul Graham no longer have a stake in Y Combinator?