This one definitely lacks ambition compared to other works. Probably because his other work had a subversive undertone, this one seems sponsored by the powers that be. I also suspect it was installed with cooperation from the local authorities.
This one definitely lacks ambition compared to other works. Probably because his other work had a subversive undertone, this one seems sponsored by the powers that be. I also suspect it was installed with cooperation from the local authorities.
I think you took a wildly different interpretation of this art than I did.
It’s not the art itself in a vacuum. If you’re familiar with British politics right now, especially around flags, it provides important context.
The “powers that be” hate ideology?